Libertarian National Socialist Green Party

Asymmetric Activism

Modern society has rendered many of us so impotent that "getting involved in politics" becomes equated to finding a political organization, sending checks and buying products to support the agenda. This thinking is outdated in an age when the modern society combination of liberal democracy, capitalism, humanism and materialism has essentially taken over the industrialized world, and must be opposed by not just asymmetric warfare but asymmetric activism. What is asymmetric activism? Like guerrillas, activists find a clear message and manifest it in many forms without concern for the political identity or group supporting them.

In this context, we must view National Socialism not as a political party but as a language of values that can be spoken in any context. In this view, any organization whether left or right has positions which can be improved by an awareness of National Socialist values; their political language can be made to reflect our values, because our language possesses all aspects of politics and society. Much as you can tell several different people the same idea in a different form, based on the words they use and the concepts familiar to them, National Socialism is a language that can be spoken in any setting.

In asymmetric activism, the ideas do not need to be identified with a specific platform or party, because they are spoken in all platforms and parties. Our goal is no longer to identify ourselves clearly with a symbol or a party, but to insert our ideas wherever they are relevant.

If someone is an environmentalist, we can point out how having local communities with a dominant culture that checks reckless capital expansion is necessary to curb land overuse, and how a strong government that can stop polluters and remove litterers is essential. They will agree with the ideas first, because these ideas dovetail with their own, and later may or may not find out that they are National Socialist ideas. However, they will repeat these ideas and soon the ideas will gain permanence among other environmentalists.

If someone is a conservative, we can point out how traditional values are overrun by modern culture and we need cultural consensus to have our traditional values again. We can also show very easily that without a more active role of culture and government, none of this will happen. The conservative will see how their own ideas require the methods and ideas we suggest, and will repeat them to other conservatives. They will then adopt the National Socialist language of values into their own.

If someone is a liberal, we can point out how a socialist economy needs something other than money as its primary motivation in order to stay afloat. We can point out how Soviet Russia and other extreme Socialist states collapsed because of their lack of a unifying factor, like culture or an overriding philosophy, and how future Socialist states need something to unite them, with hinting that national culture for indigenous peoples is a good idea. The liberal dogma with which this person is familiar joins neatly to this idea, and they will find it a more powerful idea, and soon more liberals will be speaking coherently in the language of National Socialism.

If someone just wants a good job, safe streets, and opportunity for his or her children, we can speak to this person in the universal pragmatism of National Socialism. We need culture as a primary motivator, and that requires each locality or national culture rule itself, and that we can use culture to check the rampant capitalism of greedy plutocrats as well as the reckless self-enrichment and destructiveness of the parasitic crowd. The normal but independent thinker will have noted these things before, but now has a philosophy of them that makes sense, and can begin speaking the language of National Socialism and converting others.

These people will not need to know they are speaking the language of National Socialism, and right now it is better they do not, as National Socialism is demonized. They will have gained an understanding of the philosophy, which is more important than repeating symbols and shouting slogans, and as this philosophy spreads other belief systems will converge upon National Socialism and make it stronger. Where we change minds, we win; where we stand behind banners and shout, we appeal only to a limited audience who have already decided on our course. We need new expansion and not repetition of past actions.

Adolf Hitler was the progenitor of this philosophy. In inventing National Socialism, he and his allies took the traditionalist philosophy of the German pagan volkischer movement and joined it to the conservative political elements in Germany, then hybridized it with the method of the modern State, which is Socialism with media control. They created nothing from thin air, but adapted the values which will be eternally true of Germans to a modern state by building consensus among different political elements. Where we are divided, oligarchs rule. Where we are unified, even if partially, we have the strength to oppose those who rule by mass media and manipulating governments.

Too many people get stuck on the minor details of National Socialism, and run around screaming about African-Americans or Jews. This makes no sense because inherent to Nationalism is that we rule ourselves according to our culture, and this excludes others from participation even without government interaction. When Nationalism is implemented, all of our perceived problems with other ethnic groups will vanish, and we can deal with the bigger problem: many of our own people have negative and destructive values and act against the rest. White self-rule is impossible when we are awash in white parasites. Ranting against African-Americans and Jews not only fails to bring about Nationalism, but it alienates potential allies.

The only judge of our success is history. If we change the course of our society from its inevitable decline, we win. If we do not, not only do we lose but so do all of our enemies as humanity extinguishes itself in overpopulation, pollution, religious wars, and a corporate feudal state that makes us all slaves. Our goal must be success by whatever method, and National Socialist activists would do well to abandon their previous symmetric, symbol-oriented behaviors for asymmetric activism so that we may insert our language into all others and gain power for our ideas, not our symbols.
by Steve Martinez, January 31, 2007