Libertarian National Socialist Green Party

I saw a bumper sticker yesterday that said "Hate is Not a Family Value." After contemplating this false dichotomy dividing human choices into two simplistic categories, I saw through it, to where it and I agree. I'm not a big fan of hatred.

The writer Tom Wolfe refers to liberalism as "a fashion" and in my experience he's correct. It is not a fully developed ideology, but the kind of emotional reaction that divides the world into hate and non-hate. It is not a belief system for thinkers, but for harried distracted people who want to do well and have no idea where to begin.

While many will attack liberals, I think it's fair instead to say that they are misguided, and to explain to them where I agree with their emotions and not their solutions. After all, I agree with liberals on the basics of the their creed: we should treat people fairly, and prevent a larcenous wealthy minority from exploiting them.

What I don't agree with are the emotional tantrums that develop from that, such as a hatred of anyone who is born more favored by nature, or an insidious desire to work against any majority in the name of "equality." I don't support their conception of revenge against those who are getting ahead through the mechanism of saddling them with parasites.

I also don't believe in pacifism, because in my experience, it doesn't work. All that it takes for evil to prevail is that good people do nothing, to paraphrase a cliche from the past, and pacifism means failing to oppose. Non-violence, in the Gandhian sense, is not pacifism. It's fighting back with non-violent means, and I don't have a problem with that.

But what I think unites me and the liberals is that we have the same emotional impetus, and I think it's fair to realize that emotions are a kind of intelligence -- a profound one, if disciplined. What they are not is a method of achieving a solution, and this is where I differ from not only liberals but today's "conservatives," to whom I'd have to ask the acidic question, "And what do you conserve?" Certainly not traditional culture.

Through this emotional impetus that I share with liberals, I cannot see a place for hatred in politics. It's an emotional reaction as poignantly defeatist as the pacifism of liberals. My desire is not to use emotions as a solution, nor to use emotions to invent a "the world would be better if" style ideology, but to find solutions that work in the real world for our problems.

This means that I am not interested in creating fanciful ideologies which pursuit absolute, symbolic, and emotional ends without concern for how they work in the world. That's like wishing for a tree of eternal fruit in a forest: it's not reality. Reality is that the forest operates the way it does based on millions of years of evolution, producing a more intelligent design than humans ever could. Reality is truth is reality.

I see the hate-ideologies, both liberal and neo-Nazi, as being part of this tendency toward emotional outbursts of fanciful, unrealistic "solutions." Unconditional hate is as much an unrealistic response as unconditional love, because what makes love precious is that it is granted where deserved. What makes hate precious is that we reserve it for the error of our ways, and when we recognize that hate, we change our ways and get over our hate.

Most white nationalists, neo-Nazis and white power activists are caught up in this emotional reaction. They see Hitler as someone with one mission: to hate Jews and Africans. They distill his ideology to an emotional outburst, in agreement with the mainstream media who portray him as motivated by "hate," and then sit around moaning that others don't see the inherent truth of their words.

Their psychology is not unlike that of extreme liberals who come up with equally unworkable solutions and then condemn the rest of us as "sheep" for not seeing "the truth." The mental state of both groups is based in the needs of the individual, not an honest activism. They want a chance to elevate their status through cognitive dissonance, by claiming the rest of us are wrong and they are right. They do not care if a solution comes about. Their "beliefs" are a fashion accessory, a justification for a lifestyle, but not a workable plan.

White Nationalism is dysfunctional because white nationalists are too busy blaming the Jew and the African to realize the basic problem they face: their society is falling apart through bad values, specifically the fashion of revenge-based, liberalized thought patterns. Liberals and white nationalists are part of the same decay, which is less a mental problem than bad mental hygiene, and allowing emotional symbolic reality to replace pragmatic thinking.

The solution to our problems begins and ends with white people. As Hitler noted, our values are garbage and transitory, empowered by the ease with which technology allows us to live. This allows parasites and parasitic ideas to live among us, and our values to decay into an ethic of convenience whereby money and popularity trump any form of realistic thinking. Hitler had many solutions, and only one was racial hygiene.

Hitler's approach to racial hygiene had two parts: the first being a cleaning up of Germans, and the second being a deportation or removal of other ethnic groups. His original hope was to send Jews to Madagascar, and to repatriate gypsies and other groups. As the war wore on, he ended up approving plans to use these for labor, and whether or not the Holocaust happened is immaterial: the mistake had been made. And in our modern time, people bleat out a repetition of this mistake as an ideology.

Hate is not a motivator for a healthy change to our society, because it removes the real task -- fixing our values, and implementing racial hygiene among white people -- and supplants it with a hideous parody of a belief in which we wage constant war against anyone non-white. Not only is this dysfunctional, but it's cowardly and passive, in that we are supposed to sit around and whine how we've been victimized and someone should do something about it.

The LNSG differs from every other white nationalist or neo-Nazi movement in that we look at the actual substance of National Socialism, which is a different type of society that aims to replace our bad values with healthy ones. Our goal is not to blame others, or hate them, because hate in that sense is an impotent and pointless activity. Our goal is to fix our own values so that together we have a consensus and can agree on what we want in society.

White people have deluded themselves too long with the idea that letting our decisions be made by popularity (democracy) and profit (capitalism) is a path to victory. People like this for the same reason they like the lottery: even if they don't win, there's a chance they might, and it's equal for everyone, so no one is favored by nature. The root of our problem in the West is that we've let this mentality of revenge replace our desire to do what is realistic, and even more, what makes life better by design within reality. We've gone off track and we can't blame Jews and Africans for that.

We at the LNSG have long accepted that we will not be as popular as other groups because our message is not a reassuring "It's not your fault, blame others and destroy them with hate, and then everything will be Leave it to Beaver happy again." Our message is that white society has lost its values, white society has corrupted itself, and white society has produced white parasites that tear it down. In our view, multiculturalism is error and multiculturalism (a fancy name for globalism) came about because we are motivated by money and popularity and not good values. You can't blame Jews and Africans for that.

It was our mistake. Or rather, it was a mistake of the lowest (whites) among us, and their passive evil went unchallenged by better people, so it has become the de facto standard. It has become popular because, like unconditional love as offered by liberals, it disguises an agenda of revenge and of shirking responsibility for fixes by blaming another group and claiming equality will fix it. And what is equality? Equality is the desire of each person to be given acceptance and membership without work. It's a form of spiritual laziness.

National Socialism, like a lone hero on a white horse, is not hatred or love. It is both death and justice riding in from the sunset to remove that which is unrealistic, and praise that which is, in the name of making humanity rise toward always-greater heights through struggle. In this struggle, we do not fear for ourselves, but keep our eyes on the goal.

The error of white society has been to abandon this struggle. Fear and self-doubt make us want to be equal while we sit on our sofas and play video games, so that we do not have to engage with life, because engaging in life and struggling for something better means that we must face and overcome fear of death, and fear of our own inadequacy, as well as knowledge of our limits. It's easier to sit back on that sofa and not challenge ourselves, because then our fragile egos can rest assured that they will not face a crack in their facade.

We can always retreat inward into ourselves, and reign kings in own our worlds of self-delusion, because it is easier and if given the choice, some people will take it. As their values become accepted, more in the next generation will take that choice, and so on until most people in society support that idea. Liberalism, and white nationalist hatred, are both outpourings of this passive fear, and equally they help destroy us.

Our goal in the LNSG is not hatred but practicality. A strong consensus of values, called culture, is our only bulwark against popularity contests like capitalism and democracy which, by giving most people a lazy anonymous choice, will end up in them picking to stay on the sofa and not do anything challenging. In this way capitalism and democracy take great societies and erode them into third-world burnouts, but the error isn't capitalism and democracy, but the spiritual outlook that says staying within the self is better than reaching out to the world and doing what is right, or even beautiful, within a realistic context.

Unlike many, we do not hate anyone. We do not hate Jews, and we do not hate Africans. We do not even hate lower quality whites, although our goal is to prevent them from breeding. We simply work toward a practical design for society, and any person or group of persons, regardless of race or colour or creed, who works toward this goal is our ally and we will esteem them as equals. This doesn't mean we want to get multicultural with them, but if they understand our shared goal, they don't want that either.

White power (white nationalism) is black power (black nationalism) is Chinese power is Tamil power is Basque power. Nationalism is a universal principle, and it's how we start fixing society, by dividing into into groups united by heritage so they can find which values they share and rule themselves by those values. White nationalism however is not an excuse to hate, and those who turn it into hate are converting it from a solution to another cowardly fashion that furthers our road to ruin.