Libertarian National Socialist Green Party

Every healthy parent wants a child that will improve upon the parent in every way possible. This is the benefit of asexual reproduction, and what makes evolution possible. When we apply this toward politics we realize that we must continue growing in response to a changing environment, and not become stuck in the past.

This does not mean that I believe in the farce that is "history." Just because a Jewish prophet died and they changed the system of numbering years to reflect this fact, or that we now have this nifty "technology" that enables us to construct our reality based around preserved records and not personal knowledge, does not mean that what it is to be human has changed in some fundamental way. The process of daily life has altered, but the eternal questions, joys, sorrows and hopes remain the same.

Adolf Hitler was a genius who rose during a time of great sadness for Germany, and through his methods, Germany was able to fix many of the problems of the time. Then, as if forseeing the superpower conflict ahead, he attempted to use military might to solve the unbalance between European nations of a leftist slant (USSR, UK and USA) and those of a traditional form of a government. He was not successful for many reasons, most of which having to do with being hopelessly outnumbered and dwarfed by American and British industry.

Consequently, what we celebrate Hitler for today is not as much his effect on military history as the changes he wrought to intellectual history, mainly by reviving pre-Christian and pre-liberal traditions which denied the notion of history, and sought instead the eternal. For those who have joined us recently, I'll restate a definition of liberal: any idea that measures politics by "individuals" and not ethnic nations, mainly as a way of dividing those ethnic nations so they can be exploited by government, religion and commerce, is liberal; anything which adheres to the idea of blood and soil and naturalism is traditionalist.

Since liberal powers triumphed in that war, we now live in a different world. In this time, Hitler himself would choose different methods for accomplishing what will always be the same goals: a healthy living situation for his people, and sane values which promote only the philosophies which benefit both the society as a whole and the individual. The enemy is the same, namely, the idea that the individual is more important than the whole, and that the right of the individual to make profit and act without regard for environment, society, and tradition is more important than the needs of society as a whole to have healthy values.

In order to defeat this, we must bypass Hollywood-stylized "Nazism" with bright flags and violent acts at night and defiant, bitter, self-consuming anger and frustration; instead, we must use whatever means are necessary, including peaceful and legal ones, to promote our ideas in their core form. We must not confuse the methods of the Third Reich (as portrayed by postwar US, UK and Israel) with the ideals of the Third Reich, which are ideals eternal to Indo-European heritage and were held by Romans, Greeks, Nordics and Indian Aryans alike.

A brief summary of these views:

Like any healthy parent, Hitler wouldn't want simply a "chip off the old block." He would want us to take his ideas further and higher than he could during his time. As our adversity has increased, this means the tendency to get bitter and lash out is more likely, but if our goal is to actually achieve something, regardless of how our methods change we must act toward that goal and not toward an image of the past.