Radical evil

[scourge]

The real question of radical evil is: when an individual goes down a path to error, or a group does, how do they reverse themselves when they have come to tolerate the evil as “normal”?

http://www.amerika.org/2009/social-reality/radical-evil/

Human groups tend toward radical evil like clocks tend toward the hour or half hour mark. It is cyclic and always comes back around but without timely regularity.

The law of entropy, or the second law of thermodynamics, along with the first law of thermodynamics comprise the most fundamental laws of physics. Entropy (the subject of the second law) and energy (the subject of the first law) and their relationship are fundamental to an understanding not just of physics, but to life (biology, evolutionary theory, ecology), cognition (psychology).

http://www.entropylaw.com/

What's setting things right after society's behaviour clock passes the 6th or 12th hour (unless someone considers decay a golden age)? Perhaps disarray can extend only so far, or for so long that things must snap back to Order once more. Whos Order has acted then becomes important: their Will and Spirit, or if you prefer, their group's dna at work attaining primacy over the social system.

[Jim Profit]

My belief has always been that all organizations are evil. Individualy humans aren't so bad. Individualy they don't have the means to be all that bad. But get them in a group and they become wild, untamed, beasts of pure, unadulterated, evil! Even Mussolini agreed and philosophicaly suggested that not only were all groups evil, but that war and pestilence was nesscaray to keep this animal contained!

I believe the most enlightened and spiritualy moral of us can survive on bread, peace, and shelter alone. But those of us who desire more abstract concepts will always take that away from us. It is our duty as the more advanced of the species to keep these fucking animals on a leash. And I don't want to be some emperor bossing people around, I'd rather be some sleezy corporate executive laying off people and building up my buisness, or being some secret society member pulling some strings to start a war in the middle-east. Mankind needs death, disease, famine, and biggotry inorder to substain itself from a far greater evil. If mankind ever organized under one global rule, I dread the sortof damage we'd do to existance outside the boundaries of our planet. We've seen what man does when they discover new horizions. They whipeout all life, and fortify it calling it "manifest destiny". That is probably the most disgusting thing about humans. The things they do, and justify it because "well, it wasn't a person anyway". As if being a person is so fucking great if this is what it entails!

So to say I support authority or anarchy is misleading. I'm not politcaly motivated so much as metaphysicaly motivated. Human suffering is not so simple, or so sastisfied as to fit into one position. Chaos, tyranny, and everything inbetween can and often is used against humans for their own good.

To put it simply, I think there needs to be more "evil" in the world. More murderers, more brutal dictators, more rapists, more gang bangers. People should be afraid and not leave their houses. Maybe then they'll leave everyone else the dagnabbit alone. I'd rather people be scared and shitting themselves then have them organize to nail me to a cross, or go whipeout some other poor species. The more organized the group, the more exclusive and vicious it becomes. A sacrifice must always be made.