The Only Way to Stay White

[Brunhilde88]

You may be white, but assuming you have any children, and indeed looking into the future for your bloodline as a whole,  if you happen to remain a white ancestor, as opposed to a dead end,   how can you expect your bloodlline to stay white?

Let us consider a couple of Nordics.  Both are very blond, blue eyed and have fair skin that does not tan.  Their children will 100% inherit these traits.  If they could ensure that their children always chose partners with these traits then they could keep their bloodline not only white but Nordic.

But let us assume that the Nordic couple have a child who does not chose to marry someone with these traits but instead picks someone white with one or more traits that are darker and with genes that dominate the blond hair, blue eyes or fair skin.  Lets say this is a man who is otherwise what anyone amongst us would certainly have no doubts about calling "white" - but he has these traits, for which the scientific term is  "nigrescence". 

This leads to the Nordic couple having grandchildren who - let's say - look rather more like Italians than Scandinavians.  There are now so many whites in northern Europe who are like that compared with how it was in the past.  The nigrescent genes spread, without some kind of barrier such as a geographical barrier (the only other barrier could be a religious sect that does not allow people with certain traits to marry anyone who does not).   

The tendency with the daughter is that she will marry someone a little darker and less racially distinct, and so on through the generations, with most going in this nigrescent direction.  It is just a fact that this has happened and will happen.  The only way to stop the white race gradually becoming non-white (although there will still be some people with a bit paler skin than others who like to say they are white) is for white women to select men who are very similar to themselves in terms of matching eye colour (or blue eyes just because that is a distinctive white trait)  hair/skin darkness (or fairer). 

The trouble is that you get whites with brown eyes who sometimes feel really offended by this.  Perhaps it is because they don't like the idea that a blue eyed blonde would refuse to breed with them because she valued the future of her bloodlline and wished her descendants all to be very selective. (Meanwhile a brown eyed woman could still be fertilized by either a brown eyed man or one with the more Nordic traits so women aren't likely to sulk about it).  That is something such a man should sit down and ponder.  Because it his attitude is the kind of reason the white race is disappearing.

Yes intellligence and health are also worth considering in mate choice but that's not relevant to my argument here.  Any logical counter arguments?

[inquisitor]

Well although I am entirely with you on this point,  you must take into account that in order to maintain evolution and avoid eugenism a bloodline must meet perodically new genes. Now it does not mean that one blonde women per generation must marry a dark somalian, but if a (small) ethnic group do not diversify over an extended period of time you will end having genetic related problems. (Trisomy, etc..)

So, I would'nt be against having an Italian guy marrying a german woman, even if he is not blonde haired.

On the other hand, some races have genetic particularities that were paramount to their survival a long time ago (brute force but simple minded). Those kind of genes are nott really needed in a civilised country - I do not regard favourably persons from the first type who decide to breed with those from the second, although it would'nt as nailing Jesus Christ on the cross.

[Brunhilde88]

Well although I am entirely with you on this point,  you must take into account that in order to maintain evolution and avoid eugenism a bloodline must meet perodically new genes. Now it does not mean that one blonde women per generation must marry a dark somalian, but if a (small) ethnic group do not diversify over an extended period of time you will end having genetic related problems. (Trisomy, etc..)

So, I would'nt be against having an Italian guy marrying a german woman, even if he is not blonde haired.

On the other hand, some races have genetic particularities that were paramount to their survival a long time ago (brute force but simple minded). Those kind of genes are nott really needed in a civilised country - I do not regard favourably persons from the first type who decide to breed with those from the second, although it would'nt as nailing Jesus Christ on the cross.

Inbreeding is a problem for the immediate offspring  if there are deleterious genes.  It brings them out quickly instead of letting them build up until everyone has them thanks to modern medicine perpetuating sickness.

 A swarthy Italian guy should never breed with a blonde Nord, because the only way that could theoretically be eugenic is if she otherwise was going to breed with someone non-white.  (So that does leave quite a few available I suppose...)

A true dark haired Nordic will probably produce future generations of blonde or red haired children as he has the required heritage so I am being a bit harsh on that front.  The reason is just that eventually as our race declines, some kind of taboo against becoming darker will naturally become a rule amongst a section of whites who have some kind of religious dedication to the survival of the race.  It's all about ease of recognising  who is your own kind and not harbouring unknown contamination.

Evolution is not powered by interbreeding - which would be like branches merging - but primarily by mutations that turn out to be genetically successful.  When some interbreeding cross-racially or cross-specially (eg with Neanderthals) occurs natural selection can tear the resultant generations apart until either they die off through not fitting in with the climate (as would tend to happen), etc or some particular gene offers a lucky advantage and becomes wide-spread.

[inquisitor]

In a somewhat related topic, I am more or less active on stormfront, and I am surprised to see how White Supermacists easely mix Nazism with their own ideology.

There are surely similarities, but nazism is not solely focused on being White and Arian, there is a spirit or militarism, commautarism, nationalism, self sacrifice for a greater good, discipline and unconditional obedience. Supremacists work in a more arnachistic way with "war chiefs", self centered beliefs and objectives, clans and are solely focused on the power and superiority of the white race. It is like a toned down version of nazism.

I am suprised and sad to see that nazism today is at the "has been state" and instead white supremacism is getting more militants. Moreover, most of the white supremacists salute Hitler and believe they are Nazi too, although I fail to see how they can tuly be true nazis.

Heil Hitler

[Crusader651]

it sounds a bit biased what you say, there is a difference but nazism is socialism for white people. mainly socialism for young couples, retired veteran, young workers,and education for young children instead of the workplace. all of them white. monarchy or capitalism was seen as having failed in when it comes to social care for the people and nazism was a synthesis of evolutionary thought incorporating groups of human as units of evolution.

just like charity was given to the homeless but not really by the state. and it was probably looking for worthy and aryan homeless for example. they did not coerce their population into giving to the poorer section of society, albeit i am not 100% sure taht they did not use any tax for social purposes, but what they did was launch a vast propaganda effort for the population to give some firewood to local charity as a way to share to help poorer germans during hard winters.

you may be right, after thinking a bit of it. i recognize somalia as a non state and mostly what you describe as being white supremacist. with each tribe and clan having a bigger diversity of banners and symbols. hitler was an uncompromising evolutionist, and this seems like something they share. but in arthur keith book, he said that in 1800 germany had 120 so seperate evolutionary unit, and in 1850 it had 26 seperate evolutionary unit, in 1933 with hitler it truly became a single evolutionary unit.

[Kadster]

We could organize society into levels based on racial purity. Top being Most Pure, Bottom being least pure.

Blonde Hair, Blue Eyes
Blonde Hair, Green Eyes
Japanese People (Our closest allies in WW2, even Hitler made them Honorary Aryans)
Red Hair, Blue Eyes
Red Hair, Green Eyes
Blonde Hair, Brown Eyes
Red Hair, Brown Eyes.
Brown Hair, Blue Eyes (Never actually seen this)
Brown Hair, Green Eyes
Brown Hair, Brown Eyes

Anything else is thrown out or exterminated

[Jim Profit]

The way I look at it is it doesn't matter who we mate with, eventualy it's going to come to a genetic dead end anyway. There's only so many genetic combonations. Now, some might argue we should try to sway toward less genetic defects by watching whom we sleep with more carefuly.

It's a shame this country is so afraid of racism our scientists don't make use of themselves and study which ethnic groups are least likely to have severe retardation, and other mental/physical illnesses so we can begin a pattern. Instead we pay tax dollars to hear obvious feces like "stress causes gray hair!"

This is ofcourse assuming we don't mutate over time anyway. If we have mutations, and thus the genepool can be altered by things outside of mating, there's really no point in even keeping track. Let's face it, genetic faults are an overexcaggerated problem anyway. Beethoven was deaf and created brilliant orchastries, supposedly autistic children have above average IQs more often then not, and even Adolf Hitler was supposedly a one testicled, self-loathing, junkie!

The will to power is what decides someone's role in the world. Not their genetics.

[Brunhilde88]

Blue eyes is more important than hair colour racially.  You can be fully nordic/Germanic with dark brown hair and blue eyes but with brown eyes you never can be - although you may have children who are.   It is vital for the survival of our race to know this.  That is not to say that those with brown eyes should be seen as inferior - only that someone with dark brown hair and blue eyes should not mate with someone with brown eyes preferably.   They can mate with anyone at all with blue eyes and white as it works out by Mendelian segregation of characteristics that the blonde and red hair is kept as the majority colour when this is followed strictly amongst Germanics.

In my experience most people totally hate what I just said but - tough - it is just a FACT.

We could organize society into levels based on racial purity. Top being Most Pure, Bottom being least pure.

Blonde Hair, Blue Eyes
Blonde Hair, Green Eyes
Japanese People (Our closest allies in WW2, even Hitler made them Honorary Aryans)
Red Hair, Blue Eyes
Red Hair, Green Eyes
Blonde Hair, Brown Eyes
Red Hair, Brown Eyes.
Brown Hair, Blue Eyes (Never actually seen this)
Brown Hair, Green Eyes
Brown Hair, Brown Eyes

Anything else is thrown out or exterminated

[AryanAussie]

lmao, talk about splitting hairs.

[Brunhilde88]

I watched a TV dramatization of the Conquistador's attack on the Aztek civilisation, a couple of days ago, and I was surprised at my own emotional sense of relief that the actor playing Cortez had blue eyes.  I can see that if he had not, there could have been confusion amongst viewers as to whether the actor was himself Indian or not,  so that could have affected the accurate casting.   In another dramatization I saw of Genghis Khan, the actor was played by a brown eyed Mongol which was highly inaccurate as Genghis Khan's tribe was known as the "Grey Eyed Tribe".  These things matter when there is an attempt to wipe the white race from history.  They pick on details like that.  There is an agenda to consign certain white characteristics to the dustbin of history so that we will not understand our heritage and ethnicity - same with portrayals of ancient civilizations such as Egypt, Greece and Rome.   Already they have succeeded in making whites commonly think blue eyes is just a random mutation of no racial significance at all.  I have no expectation that more than one or two people reading this post will even be sympathetic to what I am saying.

[Schwarze Sonne]

In our current times, finding a White mate who shares the same political/philosophical/ideological beliefs, as well as being intelligent and healthy, is difficult enough.  Imposing standards for hair and eye color makes mate selection more restrictive and less probable.  For now, I'd be happy if White people would just mate with White people and have White children.  Let's worry about the various strata of "purity" after that goal is met.  

In my opinion, intelligence is the essential, if not the most important, trait for which we need to select.  

--Schwarze Sonne (a blond, blue-eyed, fair-skinned male)

[Brunhilde88]

In our current times, finding a White mate who shares the same political/philosophical/ideological beliefs, as well as being intelligent and healthy, is difficult enough.  Imposing standards for hair and eye color makes mate selection more restrictive and less probable.  For now, I'd be happy if White people would just mate with White people and have White children.  Let's worry about the various strata of "purity" after that goal is met.  

In my opinion, intelligence is the essential, if not the most important, trait for which we need to select.  

--Schwarze Sonne (a blond, blue-eyed, fair-skinned male)

Eye colour trumps ideology in respect of blue eyes breeding true..  But one has to get a mate at some point and if someone really is struggling they will have to lower their standards I agree.  (Although what suits the individual may well harm the group).   A lot of men seem to be desperate to find a woman who agrees with them on political/racial/philosophical matters etc when really some compromise is usually more realistic.  In any case the woman most likely will never really be interested in all that.  As long as she loves you and doesn't do anything destructive to the race, be satisfied. Just by having white babies she is already a huge asset to our people. 

[Kadster]

We must organize society into the levels of purity, even if they are, White, Asian, Middle Eastern, Hispanic, Black (Obvious order) we need a way to prevent people from breeding with a lower class of race. If we can not suceed our goal as Nazi will have failed!

[Brunhilde88]

We must organize society into the levels of purity, even if they are, White, Asian, Middle Eastern, Hispanic, Black (Obvious order) we need a way to prevent people from breeding with a lower class of race. If we can not suceed our goal as Nazi will have failed!

Well really we just should not have non whites in our society and all the white ethnicities should also know who they are and keep to their own - while still having loyalty with the racial struggle.  One thing that annoys me is Mediterranean type people who think they look English, Scandinavian or German.  (They can pass for some regions of Scotland and Ireland and especially Wales though..)

It's not up to any one ethnicity to enforce some kind of appartheid - everyone should just know their boundaries and sort out their own ethnicity's affairs.

[Lafayette]

Hello to all here. I’ve been lurking for quite some time and this thread inspired me to speak up. There seems to be educated posters here with knowledge of genetics; perhaps you can shed some light on my genetic features.

Kadster, you stated that you’ve never seen someone with brown hair and blue eyes. I have had this combination since I was a few years old. I was born with blond hair and blue eyes. My mother claims my hair started to turn brown in a few years time. My hair has now been a light brown color for around thirty years.

My question/concern is on having children with a blond haired, blue eyed woman. Would my brown hair (blond at birth) possibly have an adverse effect on our children?

-Lafayette