Marijuana.

[14squeezon88]

I understand drugs are a sore subject in the white community, I am curious as to any ones views regarding the topic.

[sleeping]

I myself smoke marijuana daily and have no problem with people who do as long as they aren't ridiculous with it. It's a conscious decision one makes. I used to be involved in other drugs (hallucinogens, cocaine, opiates) but recently went clean (a few months back) besides the weed. The other drugs are mainly bullshit (apart from maybe hallucinogens and MDMA) but I don't see an issue really with marijuana. That's just my 2 cents though!

[creativeblue1978]

Excellent thread and/or subject. I get random drug tests now with my current job so I can't smoke marijuana like I'd like but if someday the opportunity presents itself and I'm free to do so without making a moral judgement and/or fear of reprocussions then I will do so again. I'm glad to read and agree that it should be not taboo in white interests and/or communities and/or circles. All I"ve ever used is hashish, cannabis, shrooms, and LSD. The LSD was more of a ladder or elevator that took me to a another level of perception and I wouldn't use it again because it frys your brain but I don't regret doing it I'll say. I've seen people who have used LSD too much and they are brain dead and/or at least slower than normal and no good to anyone. Shrooms cuts off oxygen to your brain so I won't use them again either. The only thing I would use would be cannabis but like I said as at the moment I must refrain because of random drug tests so I will just promote it wherever I can instead. I will add that I think it should be used in moderation and/or not abused similar to alcohol consumption (i.e. kills brain cells instead of coating them with other chemicals so what's the difference without the liver damage). It's all carcinogenic smoke though and it will kill you all the same albeit a little slower than ciggaretts which has purported to contain over 2000 unidentifiable chemicals in it.

I'm going on a tangent but since we're on the subject I want to say I had a chance to go to Amsterdam (my first trip to Europe and the first place I stopped on my visit to there) recently and had a chance to check out their coffee shops. I think it's fritzing awesome. I didn't enjoy all the coloreds and filth that seem to congregate there though. Weed seems to attract all types. Talk about other cultures taking over. The Netherlands is flooded with non-whites and they seem to be lacking in consensus of which way is best for their gov't to take. Just my two cents. I like weed. I loved Europe by the way. Hollanders were great!

Blue

[Crow]

HUH!  you wont be good nazi. You like being controlled by lower forms of haliucinations. you will surrender for jews.

[creativeblue1978]

You didn't ask me or the question wasn't posed if I thought marijuana use was good for NS. Overall no I don't think so. The altered state of mind it leaves one in and the adverse effects it has on the body is unhealthy for any community concerned about health and maintaining a healthy state full of healthy people for future generations. From a selfish standpoint no I don't think it's that bad, ie there are worse things you can do to your body. But from a standpoint of what's good for the NS state and the health of a nation and it's people I don't think marijuana use and other mind altering substances are a good idea. However if you're going to rule out everything unhealthy for your body and the state of a nation then you might as well give up alcohol as well and be a teetotaler like AH.  All that being said I was experimenting with the hallucinagens and the use was before I knew about NS. The CIA and KGB did experiments with hallucinagenic drugs and I felt that's all it was was an experiment. I wouldn't recommend drugs or mind altering substances to my children if I had any. Can I still be a Nazi? hehe

I don't see myself surrendering to Jews. I can still see through their lies.

[Crow]

Just don't be a small whore and don't show children damn drugs. Drugs sucks ass.

[INSU]

Men we are all a understanding and superior race are we not?
Here is a good point too all of us including those who dont share our pov.
If you believe in the naziisim occult view like I do then you will understand.
The plant is made by our god the one who distrubuted us across this earth from himself.
Not from the African Americans who must be sent to their isolation and learn to live without dependence on us.

sincerly- INSU

International Socialist Union

[valken09 =Malaysian National Socialist=]

Marijuana is an organic sedative used by various ethnic groups in different culture. I tried it myself and I found it strange why some people would get hooked up to this "Herb" and why others over exaggerate the destructive nature of a simple plant. Either way it depends on the individual's will power, mentality, social back round, self awareness or experience.
Plus, what is a Commie doing in this forum?

[creativeblue1978]

Marijuana is an organic sedative used by various ethnic groups in different culture. I tried it myself and I found it strange why some people would get hooked up to this "Herb" and why others over exaggerate the destructive nature of a simple plant. Either way it depends on the individual's will power, mentality, social back round, self awareness or experience.
Plus, what is a Commie doing in this forum?

That's how I view it... as a simple plant with far reaching potential. It blows my mind how some people can claim to become addicted to it. Only the weak minded should be able to claim such things. I respect that marijuana is used by various ethnic groups culturally. E.G. peyote is used by native Americans for religious ceremonies in some circles and/or cultures. I believe cannabis got a bad rap somewhere and surprisingly since being the plant was used by early European Americans (including such people as the founding fathers of the constitution) for different purposes not least of all to smoke for its mind altering capabilities. If millions of people around the world can smoke tobacco which has just as many if not worse side effects with thousands of unidentifiable chemicals in it then I see nothing wrong with smoking weed. I think its a joke. Everything in moderation though. There is such a thing as over indulging and taking to the extreme. It is still nevertheless carcinogenic smoke and therefore shouldn't be breathed into the lungs all things considered. That won't stop me though if it becomes legal and employers stop testing for it.

[valken09 =Malaysian National Socialist=]

Thats why my friend, we should smoke only organic "Tobacco" if we want to. Not the corporate junk like Dunhill.

[creativeblue1978]

Thats why my friend, we should smoke only organic "Tobacco" if we want to. Not the corporate junk like Dunhill.

Yes, of course. Organic or chemical free Tobacco would be better for you than corporate commercialized Tobacco products. I used to know someone who used to buy organic Tobacco from the American indians and the product was much healthier for you he claimed. Tobacco to be honest with you never did much of anything for me though. I would rather smoke Cannabis.

[Mussche]

 Marijuana? The problem I see is that the enforcement of it is costing the public/nation greatly. Massive amounts of capital and resources are being used to fight something that ultimately cannot be contained. It only makes sense to me that social policy on it should move from containment to control. Sometimes compromise is the only option. Besides, It is much easier to contain something AFTER it is controlled if the need or desire arises.

[creativeblue1978]

Marijuana? The problem I see is that the enforcement of it is costing the public/nation greatly. Massive amounts of capital and resources are being used to fight something that ultimately cannot be contained. It only makes sense to me that social policy on it should move from containment to control. Sometimes compromise is the only option. Besides, It is much easier to contain something AFTER it is controlled if the need or desire arises.

I have a tendency to lean toward the Libertarian side of things when it comes to the legalization of Marijuana it seems. There is no question "enforcement of it is costing the public/nation" too much and resources could be greater served some place else. Control is relative depending on what you're suggesting. The idea of regulating does sound better than controlling or containing it. Arnold Schwarzenegger did somethng right when he brought attention to the need to debate the subject. Not just for raising revenue for certain gov't programs or tax purposes legalizing and taxing it could generate lots of money. Although the gov't bureaucrats would simply think of more things to spend the money on and not decrease the national debt or in California's instance state debt. For me personally I would like to see the mind altering substance legailized so I could smoke it to relax and contemplate the universe when not working. LOL. hehe. The two party solution offers no hope for someone who wants to see Marijuana legalized as well as immigration reform  or other right leaning issues solved. Republicratism sucks... Hail the LNSG!!!

[Mussche]

 The term Control may sound harsher but what I am implying is regulation. Whether regulation leads to complete freedom or swings back to restriction is entirely open for debate. The important thing is it has to be a stepping stone system. You can't go from one extreme to another without a process of evaluation and alteration. Although the current system in my opinion is too costly with little in the way of results. However, the costs involved in an out and out free smoking society have not yet been determined either. In Canada, Pot is quite available and I would wager at least 25% smoke pot regulalrly. Enforcement has become lax over the years and the impact as a whole seems quite insubstantial. So, I would argue it is probably of little concern.

[creativeblue1978]

Oh, I see. That's what I thought. I thought you were implying regulation.

That's interesting about Canada. I didn't know that. Maybe I should move up there ... if I could get passed the unbearably cold winters (I like the idea of nationalized health care). That probably wouldn't rule out drug testing by employers still however though. There is something to be said for reliable employees and an employee who may be on marijuana even in his or her free time may be possibly more apathetic toward getting work done in the long run. There is the exception to the rule of course always. I would like to think I'm one of them.