Recent Posts

Greetings to all my fellow brothers in this White Nation, and around the world.  I am brought great joy to be associated with such enlightened human beings.  I trust that all my brothers and sisters here are united under one banner for the good of all our people.  I am  filled with much excitement and anticipation that  intelligent conversations will open the minds of people reading, as well as the minds of ourselves.  To share thoughts is human and with so few humans in the world it is important to take advantage of our  human nature.  I look forward to conversing with all of my brothers and sisters, if you are compelled to enlighten me with any thoughts or just wanna say hi feel free, because freedom is priceless.      

I reject Nationalist_07's theory that NS is for Germans and Persians only.  That is completely wrong for the following reasons:

1.  There was a multi-racial Waffen SS:  all of the races (except Mestizos, Sephardics, and Khazars)  could be seen within the ranks of the Waffen.  I suggest reading this article:
http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2009/volume_1/number_3/adolf_hitlers_armed_forces.php

2. Hitler was tempted at one point before the war to engage in an alliance with Britain against Stalin.  read:
"Churchill, Hitler, and 'The Unnecessary War'"
by Patrick J. Buchanan

3. To argue that Hitler would have "reduced their fatherland to ashes" is to cede to idiotic allied propaganda.

I agree with your point about modern Neo-Nazis though.  ANP, NSM, BNP, and NDP are all doing it wrong in my opinion.

First of all, I didn't say national socialism was only for Germans and Persians. National Socialism IS Germany. It just doesn't make sense, for example when a Russian practices National Socialism, because the inferior people of Russia are the enemies of our people, the German people. For this same reason it doesn't make sense for English people, for example to practice National Socialism. It is against the policies of National Socialism. One can not be a National Socialist if he or she follows a policy that sought to destroy the people of their nation because of that nation's obedience and ignorance. I already explained why Hitler sought the destruction of England, after 1940, it was clear that Hitler's original intent of being an ally of England would not be realized, so much like Poland who had betrayed Deutschland, England had to suffer the same faith of the Polish people. You can not deny this, there are literally tons of documents, and numerous speeches where hitler states his intend.

The problem with Persian Knight's response is that it is from a time where Hitler still hoped he could have in England an ally. My entire discussion is based around the time when Hitler realized he could not have England as an ally.



In terms of this person who I am quoting...


1) Indeed, the SS was multiracial. It had Ukrainian conscripts, Russian conscripts, Indians, Arabs, etc...

You can not believe that just because there were conscripts of different races my country would have given these filthy conscripts the right to live. The SS needed men, and it would be happy to use any one at their disposal. This doesn't mean that, Ukrainians for example wouldn't have been killed after he war.

As one person already mentioned, do not mistake a nation's military with a nation's way of life. Even Americans had negroes in their army.



2) I already addressed this point numerous times in my various responses.


3) no, Im sure I addressed this too, it is not propaganda. there are documents, speeches, and taped conversations that suggest otherwise.

You just remind me to revise this thread Scourge.

I reject Nationalist_07's theory that NS is for Germans and Persians only.  That is completely wrong for the following reasons:

1.  There was a multi-racial Waffen SS:  all of the races (except Mestizos, Sephardics, and Khazars)  could be seen within the ranks of the Waffen.  I suggest reading this article:
http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2009/volume_1/number_3/adolf_hitlers_armed_forces.php

2. Hitler was tempted at one point before the war to engage in an alliance with Britain against Stalin.  read:
"Churchill, Hitler, and 'The Unnecessary War'"
by Patrick J. Buchanan

3. To argue that Hitler would have "reduced their fatherland to ashes" is to cede to idiotic allied propaganda.

I agree with your point about modern Neo-Nazis though.  ANP, NSM, BNP, and NDP are all doing it wrong in my opinion.

About point 1, these were military units, not civil societies, so the example doesn't really make a good case. Militaries practice military life. Nation states almost always have a very different society than their own military one. There are numerous differences.

About 2 and 3, neither are logically related to the assertion that German national socialism is fit for export, so these are worse as examples than the first.

I understand many forum members have information about and favorable views of Hitler. Let's keep it to the reopened thread here.

I am not a neo-nazi but believe in the philosophy of National Socialism. The historical details and world war aren't very interesting to me as my focus is on how to make better societies and a better world.

By implementing National Socialism in every nation the quality of life and society would improve. This does not require speaking German, recreating World War 2, wearing uniforms, or any other repeating of the past.

The philosophy lives on regardless of the actors.

We didn't attack Iran at all. Hitler invited the Iranian parliment to visit a special library to convince them of their aryan roots. Iran was very close to being an ally of Germany, and that is why the allies attacked you. As a matter of fact, we weren't even a democracy when the invasion occured, so I don't know what you are talking about.

That's why I tell you to read some history. The allied forces attacked and occupied Iran in order to supply USSR with war material using Iran as a transport way. And also to use Iran's oil.  Despite Iran was a NEUTRAL state and was ally of nobody in WWII. I don't know where are you from, when you are talking about WE. But if you are from the UK, then yes of course you are not even that so called democracy. Britain is officially a terrorist state since around 400 years ago, plundering and terrorizing people, all around the world  even including their own British common people.

You better read some history. Our country was back in the track in 1930s with Reza Shah the Great as our king. We were doing very well and we could have been a great world power again in a very short time. But your so called democracies and good boys of allied countries attacked Iran and occupied our country in 1941. They totally destroyed our country and forced Reza Shah which was a true Aryan king to abandon the throne. They installed his son as a puppet and they virtually stopped all of Reza Shah's great reforms.

We didn't attack Iran at all. Hitler invited the Iranian parliment to visit a special library to convince them of their aryan roots. Iran was very close to being an ally of Germany, and that is why the allies attacked you. As a matter of fact, we weren't even a democracy when the invasion occured, so I don't know what you are talking about.

Nations who are in war with each other always want to destroy their enemies. Otherwise it can not be called a war!

The important thing is who wanted to start the war. It is obvious that it was England and her allies, not Hitler and Germany.

Your logic is a total failure. England invaded Germany, and wanted to destroy the Reich, do you really expect the leader of Germany to not strike back?

 

You are just repeating material that I already mentioned in my response.


Yes, it was Britain who started the war. And yes, it was Poland who started the war aswell when they decided to act againts Germany. These are both well known facts. And yes, Hitler wanted to destroy these countries for reasons already mentioned, you even admitted it.

When we say destroy, we mean the way we destroyed poland for acting againts Germany.

So, my question still stands.


I find it interesting that thus far not a single convenient answer has been laid out to me. It just shows the unawareness of these neo-nazi's of our time. Blind followers of a system that would have sought the destruction of their Fatherland had we won the war.

Solution, lets really form a real party and not a virtual one. You guys who are residing in the US should start 1st since all of you are more closer to each other, thus easier to organize and establish a solid and stable organization.