Libertarian National Socialist Green Party
ABOUT |
PLATFORM |
LIBRARY |
COMMUNITY |
Opinions
Community
These are the questions we respond to as part of our public dialogue to address the concerns of the rest of our species, ordered numerically descending by frequency.
- About
- Beliefs
- User Questions
- Projects
What is the LNSG?
The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party (LNSG) is an activist group and think-tank. The LNSG believes that modern society is a destructive force based on the philosophy of consequentialism, or the idea that what most people believe they want is what is best for society. In this view, modern society is not a product of technology but of the philosophy of consequentialism, which the LNSG believes encourages people to consider only themselves and thus to unknowingly perpetuate a destructive order. Modern society is the most comfortable of all existences, and the one with the fewest actual responsibilities, but in turn it creates vast internal problems which manifest themselves in the signs of human decline:
Consequentialist systems, by placing on emphasis on what individuals want and not what they need, creates a false value system in which reality is no longer the focus. Individuals are detached from a collective goal of adapting to a situation, and recede further into what they think they prefer, which loses meaning as they have no goal except themselves and the pleasures they can find. This meaningless life leads to all forms of spiritual, social, moral and intellectual decay.
When we look at the past five hundred years, we see a radical increase in technology alongside an equally rapid encroaching shallowness. Life's meaning is now defined in things owned and the approval of others in mass groups. The first sign of our decline is that our art and literature is now meaningless and reflects the neurotic state of people who have become isolated in subtle but pervasive egomania. After that we notice the damage humanity has wrought upon its environment, the political systems that manipulate us and achieve nothing of substance, the increasingly hostile environments in which we live and the boring jobs and social events that most use to fill their lives.
Unfortunately, few people have the time, inclination or ability to see this. They prefer what they think benefits them immediately, which is inevitably greater wealth and social equality, although it does not make them happy and creates problems that are "socialized" or have their cost distributed among the community. They willingly succumb to propaganda that says a free and open society is the best way of life and in their fixation on themselves above all else, ignore the problems until a disaster strikes. As humanity grows to unstable levels and problems not only persist but deepend, those who can still think critically and independently realize our species is at a decision point. We either change our ways, or fade out into the form of oblivion where a few crafty super-rich rule masses of ignorant, malformed, cultureless drones.
People will not willingly check their breeding, buy fewer objects and think of the community because they are taught this is a path to oppression. Further, it is to their financial disadvantage to act in such a way, and they will even sometimes admit the depth of their fear of other people and the mechanism of society. In this situation, the smarter people breed less and as a result are even further outnumbered by the thoughtless. People will not act on their own to stop the disaster that is modern society. They require a strong social and/or governmental force to instruct them. What they "think" they want and what provides the best future for them are two different things.
For this reason, the LNSG incorporates several social/governmental ideas, none of which are unique to a modern time:
Our goals as an organization are as follows:
The LNSG is not a membership organization, or a protest group. We change minds with ideas. We do not believe in mindlessly repeating propaganda and shoving it down the throats of those who do not desire it. We know our analysis is correct, and that our cause is not only just but pragmatic, and for this reason, we continue our mission to educate and provoke the rest of our species. Unlike modern political organizations, we do not concern ourselves with general popularity. Our target are a select few who can understand that life, despite having some difficult and scary truths, is better lived for having faced our fears and overcome them.
We recognize that politcal truth describes a sensible way of living in this world, and that it takes many forms, but that each of them is an attempt to describe the same thing. Most people prefer to pursue a path of "individualism," or putting their own comfort before all other considerations, and so develop an ethic of convenience which allows them to support one or another political parties who will enact zero real change while raising a hue and cry over symbolic issues like abortion, drugs, gay marriage, and the like. The truth is that the greatest threat to our society comes from its own lack of direction or honesty.
The LNSG has few friends because it does not provide such a ready-made, fast food snack of a political discourse. Our unpopularity with the left stems from their desire to feel important as defenders of perceived "underdog" groups, and their desire to smash native European culture so that no standard interfere with their pursuit of individualism. The far right dislikes us because we do not accept their dogma that violence and scorn toward minority groups constitutes political activism (or even a functional plan). The moderate right detests us because we are not proponents of the monetary system that grips the West and supplants our values with an assessment of what is popular/profitable. Among those who can think for themselves, LNSG membership is rising.
National Socialism is not unique. If anything, it is a modern restatement of ancient ways of living as found in Greece, Rome, Germany and India. It is how our ancestors and the wisest among us have learned to live. It is not as simple as saying that National Socialism is about race, or totalitarianism, or even a corporate socialist state. National Socialism is not a political force, but a philosophical one which reshapes every level of society and yet leaves the best parts untouched. The goal of National Socialism is a sustainable, natural society that preserves our ethnic diversity, individual abilities, and culture heights. Every healthy society in history has discovered a version of National Socialism and upon relinquishing it, its fortunes have declined. This decline may take millennia but it is inevitable and final. Our goal is to stop the decline before a technological humanity ruins its world and itself. The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party is a restatement of National Socialism for postmodern times, but we are part of a tradition that goes back to the ancients and extends far into the future.
A fundamental tenet of ancient societies was the realization that times may change, and fortunes may change, but the same values will always be present for humanity. We respect those who do what is right as individuals in any era, and when they cease to do what is right, we say they are in decline. Nations, and even species, have similar life cycles, but we have a window to stop this downfall before we bring environmental cataclysm, loss of culture and unique genetics, social boredom, passive philosophies and urban rot upon ourselves. The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party is dedicated to doing what is right for all of humanity while we have time.
Are you guys Nazis?
We are Nazis. Our beliefs are derived from National Socialism, which is in turn derived from the union of spirituality and philosophy and politics and culture that has been part of Indo-European society since its inception. We choose to emphasize the Libertarian and Green aspects of Nationalism because they are forgotten today by many who misunderstand historical National Socialism, and take it to mean oppression or the corporate state.
National Socialism is neither rightist nor leftist, but its basic concept stems from the eternal human belief that a nation is like a family and it should take care of its people. This means defending them from enemies inside and out, and the enemies we see are those (of whatever religion, race, culture) who behave in a parasitic fashion; many of our own people have fallen into this misguided and destructive behavior. Excessive economic competition wipes out the thinkers and rewards the gluttons. Excessive social decay forces people to scramble for income to escape the disaster, and ends with a society of many impoverished dumb people ruled by a few smart but parasitic wealthy elites.
We cannot find the answers we need in either right or left as currently construed. The right is entrenched with Christianity and big business, and the left is opposed to both indigenous culture and the concept that some individuals might rise above others except through social means. These belief systems both serve the idea that we must continue our economically-driven, mass-conformed society or we will lose our technology and our ease of life. The left aims to pacify our natural instincts to assert what is right no matter if those who get in our way are harmed, and the right invents phantom enemies and expends our lives chasing them while continuing a system of profit for the super-rich. Neither will work, and no amount of reform will fix them. Their basic design is flawed, like a "lemon" car or a faulty building.
Nazis are first and foremost Nationalist. A Nationalist believes that nations should be organic entities, or "nations," instead of "nation-states," which are disparate peoples joined by an economic system and ideology. We believe a nation should be delineated by genetic familiarity, and that within that nation "socialism" or the collective support of individuals in society should be a guiding rule. As part of our belief in nation, we believe in culture, and unity of humankind and the natural environment. We must protect it by reserving most of the land for unbroken forest, field and stream. Economic systems do not permit this because there is profit to be made in exploiting the wilderness, as American Conservationist John Muir noted.
We reject personal morality as unnatural. This form of morality asserts that what is most important is not denying the "freedom" or life to any individual, but we recognize that many individuals in every culture are prone to parasitic or destructive behavior and they must be restrained. Moral law enforcement systems do not work. Criminals are arrested, and more appear. This is because they are afraid to designate some behaviors as destructive and to be intolerant of them.
We refuse to acknowledge the demonization of National Socialist politics as legitimate because of the greater viciousness of the systems that replaced it in the name of "freedom." War has not ended, but has increased. Pollution has increased. Urban decay has increased, as has the alienation and passivity of the average citizen. People cower like mice and are "happy" for a job and a car, but they are not happy and have no meaning to their lives. We collapse inward and those who profit do nothing to stop it.
National Socialist and Libertarian/Green ideas have tremendous potential for positive human success in society as a whole, even if they inconvenience or exclude some people misguided into destructive behaviors. Modern society does not work because its basic philosophy is misguided, and so no matter how much we reform, problems remain -- and grow. Our resistance to the current order led us to a search for core causes of the almost universal failings in human government, and as a result to target certain widely-held notions about its construction.
What is National Socialism?
National Socialism is the concept of the organic state, in contrast to the "nation-state," or disparate group of people unified by an economic system. It is a timeless concept based on the idea that cultures develop specifically for the land and people who settled it, and preserving the uniqueness of these gives people something of greater importance in their lives than economics, politics or even personal greed. It is a way of bringing people together to focus on the goal of society as a whole, and to give them the benefit of generations of learning and protect them from the greed and viciousness endemic to excessive economic competition.
The basics of National Socialism:
We are socialist because we believe economy should serve the nation, and the State is a vehicle for serving the nation. We are Nationalist because we believe in the organic state and the specific culture of that group linked by heritage, language and values being more important than any other factor. We are green because we believe nature is the master science of humanity. We are Libertarian because we believe non-destructive acts, no matter how "weird" they seem to an assembled crowd, should be tolerated while destructive acts must never be.
Why is national socialism different from any other political system?
Most people who ask this question are caught in the current definition of political system, and have not seen enough of broader history to realize that it is only recently that "political system" meant "administration for economic system." National Socialism, and by extension Green parties, transcend the nature of politics by removing the focus on monetarism, or the system of generating wealth on paper, and returning to a focus on tangible wealth and social values. This alone makes this system of government entirely different from those in immediate memory before it: it is focused on a healthy civilization instead of a profit for an elite whose only claim to power is that they earn money!
Is National Socialism refuted by the defeat of Nazi Germany in WWII?
No. The political system is separate from its instance, and continues to grow without the presence of any single group.
You seem to be apologists for the Nazis. Are you ashamed of what they did?
We do not believe in guilt and/or shame. We do not agree with everything the Nazis did. We are certain that much of what they did has been mispresented by history, as the victors write history from the pages of their propaganda.
II. Beliefs
Why are you so touchy-feely about the environment? Are you hippies?
Good ideas show up in many places. R.W. Emerson would have felt the same way about our natural environment, as would have many classical thinkers - had they lived in a time when environmental destruction was as widespread. In their day, most of nature was untouched by humankind and our technologies wrote from steam, iron, wood, rubber and glass were nowhere near the complexity or destructiveness of an age of nuclear technology, plastics, synthetics and microchips. Humans dominate up to 98% of the useable space on every continent and have slowly squeezed native species out of their environments, breeding them into pseudo-domesticates. We have polluted the ocean such that rafts of human plastic waste miles wide float between continents. Our use of chemicals best kept sealed apart from nature has produced barrels of toxic waste sitting on our land, or at the bottom of the ocean, or sealed away in deep mineshafts. No wonder cancers have been steadily rising since the advent of the industrial revolution.
However, this isn't the "reason for" our support the environment. Nature is our point of origin into this world and the order that still regulates the world around us, including many aspects of our own behavior. We don't fully understand the universe and we don't fully understand nature, despite our claims to having "mastered" nature through technologies like the internal combustion engine and hydrogen bomb. It is wise to recognize the universal wisdom of natural design and to embrace it as it is both superior to and more pragmatic than anything we have created. Further, as an object of function and for lack of a better word, art, nature is uncomparable and remains an inspiration to us all.
Nature as an ideal and actuality is the best centering for any political viewpoint. It ensures that first, we do not wipe ourselves out by disregarding our environment; second, that we learn early on to appreciate beauty and function and larger systems than the linear concepts that social logic permits (being of one form of power transfer, human, social logic becomes rapidly able to think only in these terms, thus linear); third, that we find inspiration in studying the largest and most complex form of creativity yet shown to us. Hell, we could go on all day. If you don't think nature is worth saving from greed, pollution, mini-malls, highways, strip shopping centers, plastic trash, toxic waste and endless parking lots, what's wrong with you?
Won't it destroy the economy if we start suddenly worrying about nature?
We are restructuring society around values, and economy will serve them, instead of the other way around (the current method). The economy is very flexible and scales well, so if we impose sudden restrictions for reasons of natural preservation the economy will accept these, adapt to them - and then capitalize upon them. This will in turn provide economic stimulus needed to overcome many of the initial costs of bringing ourselves into compliance with a sane naturalist program.
Nature seems repulsive to me, with all that predation and stuff going on. Do we want this?
First, it is already here; society is predatory as are business, education and any other competitive field. We eat meat which comes from dead animals killed for our food. However, in nature you can be eaten as well, and this scares many people. However, without the system of nature forcing animals to become ever-smarter and better adapted, humans never would have arisen from apes. So it seems that even things which are frightening have excellent long-term prospects, and thus, we ask you look at the bigger picture and realize how wonderful and amazing it is that we're even here at all. There was no rule which said a universe had to exist, or that, given existence, life had to form; it is incredibly brilliant that a system as a whole which we call "nature" could be designed that created a universe which does not collapse on itself or lapse into cyclic, entropic behaviors, thus facilitating the space and time we know in which life itself can exist.
Do you support racial segregation?
We support segregation of every ethnic-cultural group from all others. These ethnic-cultural groups are not divided into races, but are each a specific strain which we can group into race unless we feel like being more specific. Germans are an ethnicity. Zulus are an ethnicity. Each should rule its own. This is is necessary for cultures of the many human races and ethnicities to be preserved, and thus we support racial separatism, namely separating physically from other races and breeding within one's own race for the purposes of keeping that strain of humanness alive. This is possible without absolute and mystical viewpoints on the subject, and is best served by a policy of segregating all races rigorously so that none are proportionately treated more excessively.
Are you racists?
No, we are nationalists, and we believe racism is a byproduct of multiculturalism. In a nationalist world, every race and every ethnic group has its own sphere of influence and the conflict caused by mixing people of different inclinations and creating one law that addresses no group's concerns is eliminated. When you mix different elements, you must standardize them to a lowest common denominator, and decay results.
In our experience, every ethnic group is different, and none are equal, but each is valid in its context. Characteristics both "positive" and "negative" have been distributed throughout many races, so we stand against racialism or race supremacy of any kind on the grounds that it is bogus science and a spiritual ill. People who believe in racial supremacy want to make themselves beyond critique, but the fact is that each ethnic group must do its best to breed better people and keep the parasitic, criminal and destructive from insinuating themselves into its society. Not all white people are good, and not all Germans are good, but the only way to preserve each group is to isolate it and enforce culture not economics as a deciding principle of who is valued.
We support the right of nations, or local groups, to maintain racial standards for areas under their jurisdiction. Our membership and events are open to people of all races, ages, genders, sexual preferences, ethnicities, and origins, although we do actively discriminate against those so foolish to admit to believership in Judaism or Christianity.
Our preference is that every member of every race has a pride in that race and a vigilance against any form of interbreeding or cultural dilution. With every race healthy and content on its native continent, this world has no need for the capitalist globalist culture which is slowly replacing everything we've learned over thousands of years with strip malls, cable television and Internet pr0n.
Do you support racism against black people?
Among our members we proudly count many people of African heritage. Our view is that every race should accept the ancient ways of naturalism and animism and be isolated from all other races. We support African nationalism and our African members, because they as Nationalists agree with us on a desired world order and we accept them as equals. In fact, we could not do it without you. Among LNSG supporters there are members of every ethnic group, including Jews and Gypsies. All agree that each ethnic group must be autonomous in its own space.
What is your attitude toward the economy?
The economy is a vital part of any bureaucratic civilization. It is how sustenance is parcelled out to those who need it. While no economic system is wholly capitalist or socialist, we propose an essentially capitalistic system with heavy socialist underpinning, in the style of European governments since the dawn of mercantilism. Like many things European since Christianity, this has been an attempt to civilize a basically repugnant philosophy; our concept on capitalism that is most important is that in our nations, the emphasis of the state would not revolve around the economy, but the economy would serve as a support system for the state. The state in turn would serve as a support system for a culture.
I don't understand the gold standard hubbub on many nationalist websites.
Speculative economics create value "on paper" and then when problems exist must adjust to accomodate the absence of this predicted but not actual wealth. We believe in using economies of actual wealth, such as the production of our workers, the bounty of our fields, or things of fixed value like gold or other metals. We are not however motivated by wealth and would prefer to avoid any wealth-"creating" activity that is destructive to teh environment.
All economies are formed by the expectations of citizens and their acting on the supposition that value will arrive as needed where predicted, thus even pure ideology can motivate a properly-administered system. We seek to replace speculative value with an inflation-adjusted value added assessment, taking past types of income generators and tracking how much value they have created in the progress of goods and services from raw materials to finished products.
Do you endorse gun control/support gun ownership rights?
We support gun ownership within reason. We are more concerned with the mentality of those who own guns, and picking only sane and moral people to own them, than we are with a general rule about gun ownership. We believe that intelligent, moral citizens with weapons are more effective than a paramilitary police force.
Do you support the legalization of drugs?
We support the radical decriminalization and untaxed sale of all controlled substances. We are not advocates of controlled substance use for all people, nor for all drugs, but we believe some drugs have historical importance and are not a threat when used by the right people. Those who choose to destroy themselves with hard drugs will do so whether they are legal or not, so instead of devoting our resources to slow suicide cases, we prefer to reinvest our time, effort and money into positive things like schools, great architecture, social centers and culture.
Do you support home schooling/choice of private schools?
Yes. We believe in quality public education which allows the best to rise to whatever level they can achieve and gives the less capable the best education possible, but does not reduce itself to a lowest common denominator to support the less capable. We believe in excellence. We also believe parents should have a diversity of educational options for their children. We support an increase in monies budgeted for education and the introduction of a meritocratic, multi-tiered educational system.
Do you support immigration rights?
"Rights" are a fantasy because they do not take into account the context of an action. It is not fair to native citizens to allow excess immigration. We support universal rights for every nation to be autonomous, to rule itself how it sees fit, and to conduct its affairs without the oversight of others. In this type of system, immigration is not needed by emigrant or immigrant populations alike.
How would your government change the social lives of members in the first world?
Current society chains its members to jobs and family structures to eliminate free time for thinking, obliterating any remaining independent will with television and other forms of artifically-motivated media. A Libertarian National Socialist Green government will emphasize removal of unnecessary laws, forced interpersonal arbitration in the presence of a moderator, and socialist support for learning and progressive exploration as well as publication of these discoveries for integration to a collective body of knowledge. This in turn will make a more educated and self-confident citizenry apt to socialize in different ways with more integral values.
Do you advocate the killing of homosexuals?
We advocate the creation of neighborhoods for homosexuals so that they are not hindered by the scruples of others and, to be equally fair to others, they are not required to raise their children around behavior they might not find coherent with their view of healthy childhood.
Do you advocate extermination of the handicapped and mentally dysfunctional?
We do not advocate the extermination of anyone who can contribute to society without introducing destructive needs.
What do you mean by "replacing government with culture"?
A primary goal of both National Socialists and Third Front thinkers is to replace a society of "big brother" well-meaning government, and to allow culture and the quality people of that nation to make such decisions instead. An intelligent population with sensible values lifts up that which is worthy and shuns that which is not within a useful values system, allowing such non-useful stuff to quietly, peacefully die out, as less useful things have always done in nature.
In the current time, social "ills" are "cured" by sending a team of bureaucrats charging after symptoms of the problem with reams of regulation, "creating new jobs" for many more bureaucrats and leaving society unchanged as a whole. Further, since in democracies we can't make hard and fast decisions about what values our society can support or eliminate (as it would violate "individual rights" and "lifestyle choices"), the ills go on unabated by the carpetbagger bureaucrats who profit from the dysfunction. Allowing society itself, not government, to police itself would mean this process would cease and degeneracy would be forced to find a new home.
Do you support German nationalism?
We support Nationalism for all ethnic groups.
How do you stand on censorship?
We recognize that every society has either censorship or taboo, and therefore that what matter is not "Does censorship exist?" but "Is the censorship sensible?"
III. External
Haven't you heard that racism is bad, and disproven by science?
Science has not "disproven" the concept of race, but affirmed it, in increasing degrees as genetic research is conducted. See our comments above about the difference between Nationalism and racism. Some scientists argue against race, but in a room of contradicting opinions, one is right, and so it is with science as it has been over the centuries. People yelled at Galileo for claiming the earth revolved the sun as well.
Without morals wouldn't society fall apart?
Societies existed for thousands of years before the invention of morality. Our better answer to the questions for which morality was designed is personal honor and a strong value system to the state.
Didn't you guys learn last time that the civilized world is not going to tolerate your hate?
The civilized world, or modern society (liberal democratic politics, capitalist economics, humanist/materialist values) is collapsing. What will replace it is a world nationalist order of tribal and culturally-integral systems of government, especially the damage wrought by globalism becomes apparent. In the last war, three nations attempted to withstand the social pressure the rest of the civilized world exerted in fear; as populations within those former enemies become more inured to propaganda, and less likely to identify with the state, the ancient forms of nationalism are returning to oppose the Age of Plastic.
You assault some of the values most central to this society - peace, love, freedom, enlightenment, morality - why?
Language knows no master, but has many supervisors; a common abuse is to use absolute terms to convey a meaning that isn't practical. For example, in a town where half the people are starving, a man wants to be elected leader - how does he do it? Easy: "I propose that ALL people are fed, and that EVERY one gets a meal." If there's only enough food for half of the people in the town, this means that now everyone is half-starving and thus, few strong and capable warriors, leaders, or thinkers will rise up to give the town strength against being assimilated by invaders.
Similarly, ideals like "freedom" and "enlightenment" presuppose that we are ALL equals and thus can all enjoy such things; it doesn't take into account that a pedophile, parasite or violent criminal will have a different view of these terms than someone of positive social values. "Love" and "peace" are also used to describe the intentions of republics who turn out to be the most bloodthirsty of them all. The only thing that is absolute is the judgement of eventiture, meaning how things turn out in the real world, and intentions, feelings, and absolute political statements about being "free" and "moral" are far from reality, in our experience and the course of history.
I want to complain! Your site is full of hate and should be taken off the Internet!
Knock yourself out.
No, I mean I want your site taken off the internet. Knock yourself out.
How can you sit there and support the murder of 6 million people?
If society does not reverse its course, seven billion will die and with them the future of not just the human race but our natural environment. How can you sit there and support the extermination of life on earth?
Every life is sacred to me. How can you advocate ideas that restrict the freedom of many and possibly will get them killed?
All of life is sacred to us. We want to protect it, regardless of the cost in individual lives, including ours.
Don't you realize every human has an individual, equally valid soul (that is important to God)?
The mind is a product of the brain; the soul is a product of the choices that brain makes. Nothing is equal; in physics, they refer to a state of equality as "entropy."
Without equality, we're back to the level of the beasts, and might makes right! What do you think of that?
We oppose social Darwinism, which is the idea that "earning power makes right." In nature, to some degree, might will always make a victor, but "right" is a human concept. However, in the natural world, struggles rarely come down to two beasts locked in combat. There are other ways of resolving our problems.
Are Jews a race or a religion?
They are both an ethnic group and a religion-cultural unit, according to their religious texts. We support Zionism and the Jews intelligent enough to realize that Zionism is Israeli National Socialism, and thus their only chance at self-preservation.
What is your opinion of ZOG and the Jewish conspiracy?
ZOG is a fantasy. The decay of the West comes from its decay in values, and its parasites come in all colors and flavors and sizes and stripes. Jewish values are incompatible with German values, which is why Jews need their own state and Germans need theirs.
Why do you hate Jews?
We do not hate any group. We dislike misguided ideas like multiculturalism.
Why do you complain about Judaism being racist when you could be construed as racists?
We don't complain about Judaism being racist.
Are you fanatical Christians or related to Christian identity movement?
We are not Christians; our belief is transcendental and idealistic. Any Christians who think similarly are welcome to join us. Christianity, after wreaking havoc upon Europe for centuries, is universally in decline. Those Christians who want to persist in their religion should look toward interpretations of Christianity that approximate the longer-lasting, less death-obsessed religions of the ancient Greeks and Romans and Germans and Indians.
Why do you support anti-Judaism?
We don't. We believe Judaism belongs in Israel and support the right of the Jewish people to live by Nationalist principles.
Do you advocate the killing of Jews in the current time?
No, we support Nationalism for Jews as this ends all of our problems.
Do you deny the Holocaust?
We see all genocides as a product of struggle and war, and we believe that anti-Nationalist politics are a form of genocide. We are not concerned with debating or perpetuating unnecessary genocides. Had the National Socialists in Germany not been opposed by the world, they might have been able to fulfil their original plan of deporting Jews to Madagascar.
Multiculturalism produces holocausts. We have a final solution that ends all holocausts.
What do you think about individual Jews, and do they carry the traits of Judaism?
A lot of them we like, and many Jews have written to us asking to become involved. We welcome them with open arms and support Zionism for Israel.
Why the Jews? Are they a Biblical source of evil?
Historically, Jews and Gypsies were the immigrant populations in Europe, much like Muslims are now. This is why they were a source of stress. Nationalism cures this problem. In addition, Jewish values and culture are incompatible with European values and culture. This is why the two must live apart in harmony. Zionism is Nationalism, and Nationalism supports Zionism.
Hitler was insane, wasn't he?
We've never met him, so it's hard to tell.
There's very little about Hitler on your site. Why?
Ideas are bigger than the humans who create them.
Where can I get more information about Adolf Hitler?
Try The Hitler Historical Society, an unbiased and non-profit site.
IV. Projects
Where can I learn more?
Try our mailing list, our Library of documents or our Nationalist Message Boards.
What other web sites address these topics?
Our links page has connections to other useful information. We do not agree with all sources listed there, but as we believe that truth is a singular thing which we attempt to describe through many voices, we do not rule out that any or all of them have some portion of the truth described within them.