Libertarian National Socialist Green Party

Introduction

In the worldwide politics which are so far unique to this time, humanity pauses before a choice of civilizations possible for the future in a selection of worldview that will define the coming time according to one of two basic principles of selecting what is important, or valued, for human society as a whole. While these systems have been in conflict for the past two millennia, the one most prominent now has, by the nature of its dogmatism, demonized its opposition and made taboo any positive mention of its ideology. Thus it has become difficult to see the two sides to this conflict, or to decode the hierarchy of values of each to reveal the fundamental dichotomy within: while one system aims to create a tamed society by eliminating negativity and pain, the other system aims to create a growing society by embrace the pursuit of pleasure.

History

The governmental system which currently controls most of the Western world was derived not from a single conception, but from several types of system - social, industrial and political - converging upon a single central value and expanding it to a doctrine influencing all parts of society. The social aspect which initially spurred this concept was the negative influence of bureaucracy, but in the current day, no greater enabler of the bureaucratic state can be found. As an idea, this concept was expressed in three disciplines for nearly 2,000 years before being united by the necessity of standardizing a global civilization.

A. Religion^MORE

Early bureaucratic society produced dissidents who designed the system instead around the individual, replacing collective values with political mass appeal.

B. Industry^MORE

With the advent of technology, the industrial revolution converted tribes into national states which regulated profit activity, forming the basis for international trading and politics.

C. Social^MORE

Societies in which individuals were guaranteed evolutionary success (survival, breeding) for conformity became popular, in turn shaping the populations within them.

Effects

The effects of this developing society has been profound. In addition to the furthest extension of human technology yet achieved, this system brought forth the greatest degree of choice available to the individual in both political and economic spheres and gave humans are irreplacable sense of history, in which a quest to liberalize the primitive had been achieved. The raw values of society have changed in order to facilitate these desires.

On the cultural level, the egalitarian influence of democracy and capitalism has brought about changes in what is valued. Since objects of culture must be appreciated by a wide audience, they have become populist and thus simplified in design, such that our art, learning, and ideas aim less for the highest point of quality or coherence and more for the average point of interaction. Thus things are more numerous, and diverse, and simplified, but also as a result of the simplification, less inclined to produce any variation.

Politically speaking, the influences of an individualistic society have served to polarize voters to a great degree, forcing them then paradoxically to seek greater compromise in the end result, making dynamic change impossible. While larger issues are acknowledged, the attention span common to all voters is of such a short and shallow nature that concepts must be broken down to simple syllogisms in order to be understood. Further, a reliance on "character" and "values" on a personal level has created the candidate of vast hypocrisy, civil by day and feral in the hours after work.

A case of something cross-influencing its creators, technology has proved the most interesting for this society. Since we pollute with absolute disregard for any facets of our natural environment, it is safe to assume the theocratic opposition to nature is still strong in our society, something which can be observed in public attitudes toward chaos, untamed forests and seas, and animal nature.

Together these tendencies unite in the forging of the modern human, who is someone afraid to break out of the lines of the commonly understood; thus being hampered by a demand for over-simplicity and consequently, forced to embrace a more basic symbolism of values that fails to explain their distinctive position. In this frightening aspect, only compromise is possible, hindering long-term and collective planning.

Problems

During the rise of the individualist globalist state that has come about through American values, consistent problems have been observed. A brief listing is as follows: an inability to decide upon collective values outside of the parameters of the system, disassociation from issues beyond the individual level, a predatory internal mentality that cultivates people of compromise as ideal consumers.

More interesting is how these tendencies develop over time from a small inconvenience to a commonly accepted as unchanging daily disadvantage. America and Europe at least have experienced a shift from utopian-intended societies to dystopian ones, where in the name of preserving the rights of all of us to be as "unique" as possible, a massive lack of consensus or community standards has become the norm.

Further, since the symbology of the individual and morality, in which all humans are equal, are both in full effect, few people will want to cause any form of disturbance which could hurt them socially, and thus potentially limit their future successes. The result is a civilization which not only cannot agree on any long-term goals, but also is a social container in which a natural normative effect occurs.

Solutions

Anything can be frustrating to read if presented either in whole as an abstraction, or in total as concrete data with no theory behind it. Thus at this point two paths diverge in terms of the representation of this data that we will use, an itinerary exploring the theory of a new Stateless Earth, or a conduit through the data in form of a sequence of examples. As solutions, these represent parts of a vision in evolution.

A. Theory

Any political party is unified by a concept, such as collective affirmative goal instead of individual avoidance of negativity, yet contains subsets of the conclusions reached after seeing the world in that light. Consequently, there is a grab-bag of change which behind the scenes relates to the handful of central concepts to our party.

1. Collectivism
2. Naturalism
3. Ultra-Tolerance
4. Traditionalism
5. Heroism
6. Education
7. Media
8. Monetarism
9. Expulsion
10. Materialism
11. Environment

B. Platform

The LNSG political platform provides concrete examples and rulesets indicating both the nature and specifics of our proposed changes to society through political means.

1. Restoring autonomy to the citizen
2. Equality to the opportunity presented
3. Change attitudes toward normative objectives
4. Reduction of legal complexity
5. Ensure equal rights and freedoms
6. An environmental policy to protect the future
7. Separation of the races
8. An immigrant naturalization plan
9. Promotion of Indo-European culture
10. Naturalism in popular media
11. Reputable international politics

Conclusion

Although the differences between these systems of government are not vast, the forthcoming age of a fascist superstate would alter many aspects of reality to which humans have adapted, causing by the familiarity of existence without these things an expectation of their removal, mostly through the mechanism of supplanting lower, more basic values with higher ones. The positive orientation toward goal accomplishment and non-dogmatic pursuit of what is known to be real, as concept and deed, remains one of the most important facets of our movement.

The result of a division from the morality influenced by Middle Eastern religions would be the profoundest change in a civilization of the future, in that although most of the means and experiences of living would be the same, the organizational principles toward values would be different. While the current civilization has a linear mindset regarding success and accomplishment, in this new society material and social assessment would be replaced by an interest in collective accomplishment and personal goals.

In a sense, this would be the culmination of a history which has been building since the first bureaucratic societies created an environment of detachment which shattered the tribalist, animist and naturalist worldviews before it. As it seems looking back through the ages, the event of the bureaucratic society was the dawning of the technological age, and techno-history, in its awakening of our knowledge of more abstract thinking to be required, brought about the age of questioning. The result of that age is an affirmation of traditional Indo-European values in a defeat of the bureaucratic tendency, which is to allow the method to replace the goal.

What is possibly most enticing about this form of government does not deal with its primary affirmation, namely that of moving the focus beyond the individual to the collective, but the benefits of the individual from a collective which has not given itself religious importance when not needed. The postmodern fascist will be able to select from necessary external functions to find some which he or she can perform, and barring that time be on a mission entirely disconnected from social existence and sustenance.

Through this mechanism the individual has thrust upon him or her the task of finding a meaning within life outside of the structure of society, but within sensible values, through which an expression of the individual can unify the significant passions found in life as person, tribe and world. Each person is given a unique place in society and a positive goal which can be fullfilled to make the job worthwhile, but the focus will be returning time to the individual for pursuits of the value of existence. In this the system of fascism triumphs above others in that within it the pursuit of pleasure is more important than the avoidance of pain.