Libertarian National Socialist Green Party

Judeo-Christian

The "Judeo-Christian religions" are so called because they originate in the same sources in the middle east, historically and in terms of how the religions are constructed as philosophical and spiritual concepts. Philosophers would classify them as monotheistic dogmatic religions which enforce their dualism with an absolutist idealism and mysticism. In short terms, this means that they create a symbolic world where an absolute choice between good and evil is more important than the events of the world in which we all live.

The results of these religions have been disastrous. Although Europeans have cultivated Christianity into a semi-intelligent faith by steadily hammering at its most intense theological contradictions, the influence of Jews and leftist Christians has contributed, through media and academia and government, to a culture of liberalism in the West, one of egalitarianism (pity), dogmatic symbolism (morality) and hypocrisy (dualism between intent and results).

Judaism

The immediate origin of Judaism is in the Zoroastrian faith, an older monotheistic religion which more resembles a gnostic Christian or Muslim faith (probably from influence of Buddhism amongst the tribal religions of the middle east, which have the same cultural origins as Christianity and Islam). However, the actual religion of Judaism is a collage of beliefs from Greco-Roman, Mesopotamian, Asian and Semitic faiths combined into a faith based on the belief in a single god who is not active in the physical world, but commands symbolic, moral and social importance only. This would be the type of religion developed by a defeated people who could see the proof of their God's weakness in their own subjugation, and thus had to invent a fantasy world in which to be successful.

With this religion came a culture of pity, in which those who create great things are not as important as those who follow the rules of the religion and, with egalitarian principle, treat the weaker as "equal" on a symbolic level to the stronger. This symbolism requires that all ideas be interpreted through its lens, and thus a "morality" in which pacifism, passivity and socially-acceptable intentions, as means, are more important than ends, or the goal of such actions. Where Pagan religions had no quarrel with the strong leader who subjugated millions so that a more sensible society could exist, Jewish thinkers took exception to his method, regardless of outcome.

As theological concepts, no ideas can be further opposed than the beliefs of the National Socialists (naturalists, post-moral, non-absolutist) and those of Judaism. While our preference at the LNSG is overwhelmingly for National Socialism as a system of government, it is our understanding that the Nazis derived their values from ancient Indo-European civil structure in Northern Europe, India, Greece, Rome and Egypt. In this social system, individuals are considered to be part of a natural ecosystem and thus are seen as being the capacities with which their physical (and thus intellectual: brain health and complexity is a physical trait) characteristics endow them.

In consequence, the modern "Western" culture, derived from the morality of Christianity and Judaism secularized into "liberalism," or institutional egalitarianism, has now adopted an equalizing concept of body/intentions being separate from position in life and physical characteristics, which gives it the ability to consider us all autonomous beings who choose "good" or "evil" regardless of outcome. Like Judaism, this is a fantasy of revengeful people disassociated from the process of nature, and these unhealthy values explain much of the confusion and illogicality in the West today.

Christianity

No religion on earth has been more successful than Christianity, which has touched every part of the globe with its simple message of compassion and faith. However, like most simple messages, this belief system replaces reality with pleasant symbols and comforting catechisms to prevent doubt and mortality from scaring its flock, although with its heavy emphasis on death and moral judgment, it instills a greater but more subtle fear.

Its dominant internal mechanism is simple and attacks the self-image of the individual by creating a paradoxical version of reality, to which the individual is compared and encouraged to conform. This paradoxical reality, a "pure world" in which all things are in their "true" form and thus can be sorted by their good/evil attribute, is attractive to death-fearing humans and when introduced creates an unconscious comparison between the ideal and the actual. Once people start judging themselves in the light of morality (an unrealistic dogma, as it treats situations as absolutes that are far more complex in reality) they experience guilt, and to allay that guilt, make sacrifices of themselves to morality and in effect become addicted to the forgiveness and moral justification the religion provides.

When Christianity was introduced, it claimed to reduce "barbaric" and uncivilized behavior, but really instead gave it an official face. Most of Europe was Christianized by the process of priests rounding up those for whom society had not worked, and giving them a justification for their revenge: you are bringing the "good news" to the unsaved, not taking out your frustrations on others with a pretense of moral good. Thus the endless killing of witches, heretics, dissident intellectuals and pagans seemed appropriate to the weaker people in society at that time.

Since Christianity went to Europe first, it adopted many cultural values of Europeans, such as tolerance for different types of peoples, love of family and community centers, belief in unwanton behavior and the concept of transcending the mundane concerns of reality with a belief in what is more important and more universal. As a result, Christianity is a mixed bag of beliefs - some healthy, some not - justified by an unhealthy egalitarianism which is the central concept of its morality.

Pity makes the person who can take pity on others feel self-important, since he or she is the one in power (the "master" in Nietzschean terminology) and thus is granting to others a state of equal-ness at the command of the pitier, not the pitied. The pitier is thus "lifting up" the others and in doing so, both symbolically submitting to the universe as larger than the self and affirming the pitier's status as morally "good." Where guilt encourages an eroded self-image, pity boosts self-image, at a cost of requiring additional projections of pity in the future.

Because of this belief in pity, coupled with a belief in morality, Christians and Jews share a common trait: they do not like to be seen as the aggressor, but find great comfort in having been wronged so that they can lash out at the supposed aggressor. The crucifixion myth, the Jewish story of the diaspora and modern liberal noodling about oppression/racism are the same mythos, one designed to permit a passive aggression to replace an active one. This permits the kind of radical response seen to both Pearl Harbor and September 11 in manipulating the public.

In an ideal Indo-European society, Christianity would be re-absorbed by the culture around it, which would replace pity and "safe" morality with honor, pride and heroic values. If these few changes were made to Christianity, it would naturally adjust to accept them and in doing so lose the long-term effects of the Semitic morality of its roots. It would also reduce the psychological dependency on pity and moral right that allows this society to propel itself toward self-consumptive actions. Projection would become secondary to self-discipline and individual noble and assertive behavior.