[Previous entry: "Race, IQ and genetics: a socially unacceptable topic"] [Next entry: "Vans cruise streets, deport illegals"]

01/02/2008: "Scientific record shows Watson was right"

Human races, like dog 'breeds', are defined in the biological context by shared ancestry, not by single appearance traits. With ancestry you can predict many genes and many traits, but with single genes or single traits, you can not predict many other genes or traits. Which is why you can still easily identify the ancestry of the depigmented individuals in the above picture. Population ancestry predicts the sum patterns of one's genotype and phenotypical traits (e.g. general racial appearance) while any single variable - in this case, skin color - does not.

Denial of this fact was dubbed Lewontin's Fallacy (PDF) by British geneticist A.W.F. Edwards. 'Skin color' is a false and intentionally misleading straw-definition of race, that dishonorable public scientists such as Sternberg and Venter use to manufacture consent for their ideological viewpoints about human equality.
...
One thing, though, was conspicuously missing from this whole irritating denouement: any semblance of factual refutation. There is good reason for this: everything Watson got in trouble for saying was entirely correct!

[ Watson knew what he was talking about. The real question is: how do we use this data? Africa would be better off under ethnic nationalism, as would African-Americans, so National Socialism is a clear winner here. ]

http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/10/james-watson-tells-inconvenient-truth_296.php

Replies: 2 Comments

on Monday, January 7th, Uncle Jerry said

Part of that continent's problem was Whitey turning it into a collection of colonial possessions, thus greatly disrupting the natural order of things. White-run Rhodesia saw an enormous increase in the native Black population due to, among other things, the introduction of max-output farming techniques, and now, with White competence out of power in Zimbabwe, things are painfully reverting back to what they were before the Colonial Era. Had Whitey steered clear of the African continent, both he and the Africans would've been FAR better off in the long run.

on Sunday, January 6th, Osama bin Laden said

I don't think National Socialism is compatible with blacks. Look at precolonial Africa. What did it looks like? It was very primitive and tribal rather than nationalistic. Do you think you can impose a western political philosophy upon a non-western people? What people are not willing to grasp is the fact that blacks under black rule cannot maintain a western lifestyle. Look at the nations that are currently under black rule, especially Zimbabwe and South Africa. Both nations have very racial policies as far as land distribution and political power are concerned. Yet, both nations are rapidly deteriorating.